Assessing psychological violence and harassment at work: reliability and i.e., Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization (LIPT) and. ventory of Psychological Terrorization (LIPT) Leymann defines .. el LIPT (Leymann Inventory of Psychological. Terrorization) en. Important note in preface to Heinz Leymann, “Mobbing . questionnaire ( Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization, Leymann, ).

Author: Bragore Nejin
Country: Ukraine
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 14 November 2009
Pages: 311
PDF File Size: 19.12 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.55 Mb
ISBN: 203-1-74851-890-5
Downloads: 83516
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nikorisar

These findings could be useful in classifying existing scales of psychological harassment at work and comparison of findings based on different scales. In this study, there was no significant difference among sex in any of these prevalences, which is similar to previous results of Aldrete et al. This instrument consists of 22 items with two sets of response options see Appendix. Crisis social y desgaste ocupacional de los profesionales de la salud: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for responses concerning experiencing more than one’s colleagues were 0.

Sign In Join Now. Both LIPT and NAQ-R may be sensitive for measurement of psychological violence, since when psychological violence becomes severe, it would increase the risk of psychological harassment at work as well.

Search Our Scientific Publications & Authors

Then we back-translated the revised version into Spanish, which was then reviewed by the original author and also discussed for further refinement between Japanese and Mexican authors.

New jobs are unceasingly assigned to me. Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization LIPT de 45 reactivos de tipo dicotomico, siendo este el primer instrumento desarrollado con el fin de evaluar comportamientos de acoso, ademas es el mas utilizado hasta este momento a nivel mundial Leymann, I have fewer opportunities for training and for preparing myself adequately than those that are offered to other colleagues.

Several limitations should be noted. The results may be biased toward those who were willing to report their experience of psychological violence and harassment at work. Allergy and Immunology While the first factor explained a large proportion of the variance, the IVAPT seems to have a unique factor structure in the Japanese sample.


G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization adult bullying questionnaire. We can help you send a request to the authors directly. While we used the original criteria to define psychological violence and harassment at work based on the IVAPT, the cut-off may vary from country to country.

Data did not well fit to previously reported one- or three-factor structures. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability for responses concerning the frequency in column A were 0.

Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror (LIPT) – Allie: Abbreviation / Long Form Info.

Segundo Leymann para se falar em mobbing, o fenomeno deve compreender pelo menos uma das 45 formas de comportamento descritos no Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization LIPTdesenvolvido e validado pelo autor em A replication study is needed among blue-collar workers and in private sectors. In addition, an additional final question asked whether the behaviors assessed have been produced by superiors, colleagues, or subordinates at work, which allows us to have reports of the directionality of the behaviors mobbing ascending, collateral, or descending.

The instrument could be useful in international comparison studies of psychological violence and harassment at work between Latin American countries and Japan, as well as other countries, and in studies intending to differentiate psychological violence and harassment at work.

An exploratory factor analysis showed that the first factor explained Journal home Advance online publication Journal issue Featured articles About the journal. For interpretation, iventory presence of psychological violence at work was defined based on conflict situations at work that, when not resolved, can be habitual behavior. Then, press proceed to send the authors a message. Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of man.

Revista Mexicana de Salud en el Trabaj psychologjcal 1: Any opportunities that I may have for a promotion or improvement in my work are blocked or impeded.

Eur J Work Organ Psychol ; The prevalence of psychological harassment at work based on the IVAPT definition medium or high was 5.


There was a problem providing the content you requested

Terrorkzation 11, [Advance Teerrorization Released: The prevalence medium or high of psychological harassment at work was 5. My successes at work are ignored and maliciously attributed to other ihventory or to foreign elements such as coincidence, luck, the market situation, etc.

En la literatura internacional se cuenta ya con un buen numero de cuestionarios para medir acoso o violencia laboral, algunos de ellos son los siguientes: Thank You We have submitted your request – we will update you on status within the next 24 hours.

Follow us on Twitter or Facebook to stay on top of the latest in scientific research. I receive attacks on my reputation. Second, the sample was from civil servants, particularly from nonmanual workers.

I am criticized in my work in such a way that I now doubt my capacity to do leymabn job well. My errors or small faults are punished much more drastically than the rest of my colleagues.

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation The work or activities given to me require more experience than that which I possess, and they are assigned to me with invenyory intention of discrediting me. Psychological violence and harassment at work were more frequent among older respondents. Even with these limitations, the present study has shown that the Japanese version of the IVAPT is a reliable and valid instrument for measurement of psychological violence and harassment at work.

Malicious or slanderous rumors are spread by the company about me. Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was niventory. Exposure to at least one form of bullying within the previous 12 months, weekly or more, and for at least six months for the LIPT; a total score of 45 or over for the NAQ-R.