“The Intentional Fallacy” was published by W.K. Wimsatt, Jr. and Monroe C. Beardsley in their book The Verbal Icon in It is widely considered a landmark. Intentional Fallacy. William K. Wimsatt Jr. & Monroe C. Beardsley., revised in. The claim of the author’s “intention” upon the critic’s judgement has been chal-. Introduced by W.K. Wimsatt, Jr., and Monroe C. Beardsley in The Verbal Icon Intentional fallacy, term used in 20th-century literary criticism to describe the.
|Published (Last):||19 September 2009|
|PDF File Size:||5.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.9 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Wimatt is simply one of many valuable tools of judging quality. Rob rated it really liked it Jul 27, Such biographical information doesn’t necessarily entail intentionalism; instead it may clarify the meanings of the words, the nuances of imagery, within the literary text.
Beardsley in The Verbal Iconthe approach was a reaction to simsatt popular belief that to know what the author intended—what he had in mind at the time of writing—was to know the correct interpretation of the work. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. He was a member of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences. The critical reader’s analysis or evaluation of this evidence is open to verification infentional debate by other readers.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Grey Nutter rated it liked it Jan 05, Jul 28, Elias Vasilis Kontaxakis rated it liked it Shelves: Open Preview See a Problem? This page was last edited on 14 Octoberat Any text you add should be original, not copied from other sources. Wimsatt was interviewed, along with Walter J.
William K. Wimsatt – Wikipedia
Art, philosophy of, the study of the nature of art, including such concepts as interpretation, representation and expression, and form. Being aware of how the word s work for an author may give the reader a better understanding of how the word s work in the text. Although Donne’s familiarity with new astronomy might add a bit more meaning to the stanza, to make the “geocentric and heliocentric antithesis the core [meaning] of the [poem’s] metaphor is to disregard the English language” Georgia Goldberg rated it liked it Mar 01, Let me preface by saying that while I am a stubborn anti-intentionalist, this essay actually challenged my viewpoint somewhat.
Affective fallacy, according to the followers of New Criticism, the misconception that arises from judging a poem by the emotional effect that it produces in the reader. Intentional fallacyterm used in 20th-century literary criticism to describe the problem inherent in trying to judge a fallacu of art by assuming the intent or purpose of the artist who created it.
Art needs to be respected as an autonomous object. He is simply one interpreter among many. That a reader may overlook an allusion and still acquire its significance illustrates that primary experience of literary meaning derives from the internal evidence of form and structure. Such an formalist approach makes literary meaning wimsqtt to any reader.
Lowes’ extensive study of the sources of imagery and language in Coleridge’s poem exhibits one version of the Intentional Fallacy. And we assume that the artist inteentional some sort of motivation, or intent, going into it. Such critical interpretation is based upon private, idiosyncratic knowledge.
Sep 10, Momina Masood rated it it was ok Shelves: Building upon their discussion of the challenges of reading Donne’s poem, Wimsatt and Beardsley conclude their essay by assessing more generally the challenge of responding to allusions encountered in literature.
A Critical Summary of intentional fallacy_百度文库
It is closely related intentiohal aesthetics, the philosophical study of beauty and taste. Discover some of the most interesting and trending topics of Andreia rated it liked it Jun 10, It was quite a superb base for critically analysing Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and was a large part of my Extension English assignment this year, strongly recommend fxllacy anyone who is dunce enough to do that subject.
Marco rated it liked it Jun 21, Eliot and the writers of the Chicago Schoolto formulate his theories, often by highlighting key ideas in those authors’ works in order to refute them.
Learn More in these related Britannica articles: A perennial debate i There is a gross body of life, of sensory and mental experience, which lies behind and in some cases causes every poem, but can never be and need not be known in the verbal and hence intellectual composition which is the poem. Wimsatt and Beardsley assess three possible types of evidence that can be used to interpret literature and explain how these three types are not equally valuable or valid for literary criticism.
The Intentional Fallacy
If judgment is to be aesthetic, it must concern itself with…. If it did, than we should find evidence for it in the work itself. It is for this reason that Wimsatt and Beardsley argue that if such notes or allusions generally are acknowledged by the critical reader they “ought to be judged like any other wimsztt of composition” You can make it easier for us to review and, hopefully, publish your contribution by keeping a ffallacy points in mind.
Through studies of works by T.
Your contribution may be further edited by our staff, and its publication is subject to our final approval.