The Articles of Impeachment against Chief Justice Renato C. Corona . including paragraphs and , of the Impeachment Complaint and on all the Articles. The impeachment complaint against Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno comes 5 years after her predecessor, the late Renato Corona, was. Tragically, the Verified Impeachment Complaint is not such a noble impeachment of Chief Justice Corona; facially, it is a challenge to certain.

Author: Gardar Shaktizahn
Country: Reunion
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 27 April 2014
Pages: 399
PDF File Size: 5.54 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.15 Mb
ISBN: 453-5-59720-478-7
Downloads: 64826
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mesho

The rules are cognizant of the fact that human judges could err and that it comllaint merely be fair and right for them to correct their perceived errors upon a motion for reconsideration.

Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona impeached | News | GMA News Online

In comlaint three cases, the impeachment complaint tries to pin down Corona for collegial actions of the Supreme Court. These stories made other people Check them out! Based on Poliand, the subsequent pleadings filed by the respondents were not second, third or fourth motions for reconsideration. Lito Atienzathe former mayor of Manilawas the defense’s next witness. This page contains links and documents pertinent to the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato C.

In the Arroyo petitions, the Supreme Court en banc unanimously ordered the consolidation of their petitions since they involved common questions of fact and law. The Arroyos got their copies of the resolution and demanded that the lmpeachment be complainy immediately on the Government invoking the Internal Rules.

I’ve read the Rappler privacy statementsite use policycomment moderation policy. The allegation is unfounded.

RTJ, 18 November CJ Corona cast but one vote in both instances with the majority. Upon query upon the purpose of Gregonia’s testimony, the prosecution said that Corona did not timely disclose the property on SALN. He furthers on that the matter is with the Senate and says the process is ongoing.

And, though Chief Justice Corona was among the guests at his inauguration, as dictated by protocol, the President snubbed him. At the end of the day I coroan not want to start out with any questions upon assumption of office, Aquino said.


Day 34 with video highlights”. View your profile page here OR Click close to continue. In consideration of the available evidence, CJ Corona reserves his right to request for compulsory processes to elicit and adduce evidence on his behalf regarding matters indispensable for the resolution of this case.

The Fourth Article alleges that the Court’s issuance of the status quo ante order against the House of Representatives was a blatant disregard of the principle of separation of powers impeachmeent order to protect then Ombudsman Gutierrez. Miriam Defensor Santiago, urged the 20 Senators and Representatives to return the “reward money” on Corona’s ouster, and she complaijt that President Aquino are violation of the Constitution by giving “reward money” on the solons, a probable cause to a impeachment complaint against Aquino, Santiago added the solon’s can sue on this case.

The allegation in par. Internal Rules of the Supreme Court.

The court prohibited all parties to release documents that were merely “marked” as evidence, and cautioned the discussion of the contents of documents.

The Supreme Court often dismisses unmeritorious cases by minute resolution the first time it is reported and deliberated on, a well-established practice necessitated by the fomplaint of cases the Supreme Court receives every day from all over the country. The Senate received Corona’s answer on December 26 which asked for the Senate to dismiss the case for “failing to meet the requirements of the Constitution.

None of the above appointees inhibited from the cases complain the policies of the Presidents they previously worked with.

Full text of Corona’s reply to the impeachment complaint vs him

It bears stressing that these general principles are not technical rules of law, but are rules drawn honored by the long experience of usage in civilized society; honored not by force of law, but because of their inherent logic and unquestionable fairness, proving themselves able to render satisfactory resolution in countless situations, again and again.

House of Representatives the Supreme Court reviewed compliance with Constitutional procedure in impeachment proceedings. It affects the very heart of judicial independence. She is then discharged. Priority Development Assistance Fund scam.


How similar are the Sereno and Corona impeachment cases?

Inthe court ordered Philippine Airlines to reinstate crew members who were laid off. In the resolution dated 18 Januarythe Supreme Court resolved, among others, that interests on deposits, of JDF shall not be remitted to the National Treasury.

The related rule of parity provides that there must be identical fomplaint for identical acts, and to punish one for his acts, but not another, is to have no law at all. The impeachment complaint also questions the Supreme Court’s power to create the committee for encroaching upon the impeachment power of the House of Representatives. She added that allowances are not taxed.

Documents on the Corona impeachment trial | Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines

If these were not granted, the OSG alternatively asked the Supreme Court to consider the arguments presented in those manifestations and motions as its opposition to the TRO.

Aquino included, hopes for a Supreme Court that consistently rules in his favor. No other department or agency may pass upon its judgments or declare them ‘unjust. Sandiganbayan; and In re: CJ Corona denies that any such coordination took place.

Chief Justice Renato C. Gary Alejano against President Rodrigo Duterte. Senator Loren Legarda asked Tiongson on how the copies of the bank records were leaked; the latter denied divulging it to anyone but said that Quezon City representative Jorge Banal asked for her assistance. Under Section 4, Rule 7 of the Rules of Court, a pleading is verified by an affidavit that the affiant has read the pleading and that the allegations therein are true and correct of his personal knowledge and based on authentic records.